Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md.
The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project.
👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
DescriptionSearch first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
Search first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!) 👍React with 👍101gedejong, ssddanbrown, nucatus, whyman10x, jalberto and 96 more👎React with 👎1jsimnz😄React with 😄7GregOriol, sd416, oguz-ismail, sklyar, wizardist and 2 more👀React with 👀4nikolaydubina, boxerab, vinylen and daltondiaz
Search first I searched and no similar issues were found Description Liquibase has migrated to the Functional Source License, which is not an open source license, as Liquibase itself acknowledges. But this repository continues to misleadingly characterize Liquibase as an open source project, particularly in various places in the file README.md. Steps To Reproduce View github.com/liquibase/liquibase, or the contents of the README.md file, to find out about the liquibase community project. Expected/Desired Behavior The README.md file and any similar project documentation will no longer misleadingly suggest that liquibase is still an open source project. Liquibase Version No response Database Vendor & Version No response Liquibase Integration No response Liquibase Extensions No response OS and/or Infrastructure Type/Provider No response Additional Context No response Are you willing to submit a PR? I’m willing to submit a PR (Thank you!)
You must be logged in to post a comment.